Introduction
Research
is seen as the most important part of scientific inquiry and methodologies and
its empirical approach to the study of various social and natural phenomenon
gives it an unmatched position in today’s fast pace world and information based
society. Key in every research process is the formation, View, review and
testing of hypothesis as well as measuring the relationships between the
variables in the hypothesis. This essay therefore aims at discussing the
general purpose and characteristics of research and providing a justification
of literature review in research. In an effort to achieve this task, the essay
begins with defining, as required, the terms research, hypothesis and variable.
Furthermore, the essay shall outline and discuss some of the general characteristics
of research and justify the role of literature review in research and a
conclusion will then follow to sum up the essay’s main arguments.
Definitions
Kay
(2000) notes that the term research is a compound word, that is Re-Search where
Re means again and search means investigate hence search/investigate again. In
this perspective therefore, the underlying assumption is that there is
something known about everything however what is known may not be as true as it
may appear hence the need to search again. He defines research as a systematic
collection, analysis (or collation) and interpretation of data/information in
order to answer a question or solve a problem. According to Cozby (2009) it is
a scientific method of inquiry where there is systematic process of data
collection, observation and description so as to explain, understand and predict
a phenomenon. Patton, (2002), argues that though often times research is
mistaken for and used interchangeably with investigation, he argues that
research, especially fundamental or basic research, differs from evaluation in
that its primary purpose is to generate or test theory and contribute to
knowledge for the sake of knowledge. Research is based on the assumption that
there is a cause-effect relationship between two or more concepts called
variables whose inter-relationship is testable provable and predictable hence
the goal of research being to be able understand, explain and predict it (Kay
2000). Research therefore is a systematic process implying that research is not
an abrupt process but one which is logical and rational with proper phases and
processes hence the research process. Research is also an investigation of
cause-effect relationships between given sets of variables and involves
processes of testing and proving the inter-relations and their strengths and
correlations. Further research aims at three critical goals of understanding
(identification of variables and their cause-effect relationships), explaining
(providing logical and coherent reasons for the existence of the relationship),
and predict (provide theoretical tunes which can be used to predict future
outcomes of the given relationships) (Kay 2000).
Research
is as noted all about cause variable interactions and interrelations. But what then
is a variable? A variable is therefore seen as a factor affecting or affected
by or in a relationships hence takes up different values. Kay (2000) argues
that a variable is also a concept, which takes on different values. It is
therefore synonymous to a concept or factor which varies/changes/differs in a
given relationship. Variables are therefore seen as the units of measurements
and investigation in scientific enquiry as theories, constructs and hypothesis
have interacting variables as their building blocks hence can be rightly put as
building blocks of knowledge and cause-effect relationships.
A
hypothesis on the other hand as seen by Kay (2000) is A tentative explanation
for an observation, phenomenon, or scientific problem that can be tested by further
investigation. The term hypothesis is a derivative from the Greek word “hupothesis”,
meaning to proposal, supposition, and from “hupotithenai” where “hupothe”,
Means to suppose and “tithenai”, means to place hence a supposition, a
tentative/standby explanation of a relationship or phenomenon The American
Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (2009). In research therefore it
explains the relationship between variables tentatively in a clear and testable
manner requiring proving. Often times hypothesis are taken for facts and facts
for hypothesis, this may often be confusing however it must be noted that facts
and hypothesis are not synonymous but relate such that a hypothesis is a proposition that attempts to explain a set
of facts in a unified way and generally forms the basis of experiments designed
to establish its plausibility hence facts are in the existence of a phenomenon
while a hypothesis in testable tentative explanation for the occurrence of the
phenomenon.
It
must be noted here that not all proposed explanations technically qualify to be
called a hypothesis as there are specific feature which qualify a supposition
to be termed a hypothesis. For a tentative or proposed explanation to be called
a hypothesis it must firstly be clearly formulated implying that the given
variables concepts in the hypotheses should be clearly identifiable and defined
operationally. Secondly the hypotheses must be specific in that the direction
or the relationships between the given variables/concepts/factors is specified
such that the affected and affecting variables and how they affect each other
is clearly distinct. Thirdly it must be value free hence objectively giving
that tentative explanation. Fourthly it must be testable or subjectable to
empirical research.
General purposes of research
Generally,
as seen from the definition, research is aimed at objective analysis of a
phenomenon and is done in a quest to seek knowledge as an end in itself but
also as a means to an end. The specific aims and purposes of research are
therefore as noted earlier to describe, explain, prediction and understand
social or natural phenomenon. Research further aims at adding to existing
knowledge, challenging the status quo, proving or disproving commonly believed
paradigmatic assumptions and information.
In
terms of describing a research as noted by Kay (2000) has a general purpose of accurately
and precisely measuring and reporting of events and social phenomena, including
its characteristics and events. Hence the general purpose is to present facts
and objectively as well as accurately describe them. Research therefore gives
information and facts hence the single most important goal of research, the
pursuit of knowledge.
Research
also aims at, as already noted, explaining events and phenomenon. This thus involves
a process of investigation of causes underlying the existence of particular
phenomenon (Kay 2000). This implies that research does not only aim at giving
information accurately but also at given an explanation of the state of
information that is, why the given phenomenon exists as it does. The purpose is
to provide inductive as well as deductive explanations.
Explanation
as a purpose of research is only as good as its ability to ensure accurate
predictions hence prediction as a general purpose and aim of research.
Prediction here implies forecasting and projections. Prediction is therefore
the hallmark of research as theories are seen as proven predictions while
hypothesis as unproven predictions and constructs as relational predictions.
Understanding
(verstehen – Empathetic understanding) is amid the great aims of research it
ensures that the information is presented such that it can be understood, is
non-subjective and is value free.
Adding
to existing knowledge is one other general purpose of research as we have
argued already that knowledge is an end in the research process. As explained
above, research involves a systematic process seeking, proving and even
disproving information.
Challenging
the status quo, hence the argued meaning of research as a re-investigation or
searching again. There are many sources of knowledge including mystical,
intuitive, common sense and authoritarian and the general purpose of the
scientific inquiry through research is to provide value free knowledge and
challenge the paradigmatic assumptions of these other forms of knowledge and
their misconceptions.
General Characteristics of Research
As
note by Kay as well as by Cozby, (2009) research has several charecteristics
which involve:
1.
Systematic
approaches
In
conducting of research, there must be a follow up of systematic rules and
procedures which ensure objectivity in the process of research hence the
research cycle and ethics. Researchers operate on the ethics, rules or road map
of making inferences, observations and conclusions.
2.
Logical
approaches
Research is primarily logical and follows both
deductive and inductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning/logic as noted by The
Webster legal dictionary involves a process of reasoning from the general to
the specific while Inductive logic/reasoning involves general. That is, you start
with specific instances to general.
3.
Scientific
method is empirical.
It
means that data or knowledge is derived from reality. That is, from observations
of what actually exists.
4.
Replicable
It
means that another researcher conducting research should come up with more or
less the same research results of the other researchers using a research in
similar circumstances.
5.
Transmittable
Having
taken research, the findings of research can be in a way that findings go
beyond the research. The research findings should be transmitted from the
sample to the whole population (generalized to the whole population – should be
representative of the larger population).
6.
Reductive
When
you think about research you must realize, that you are dealing with complex
situation(s). That is reality which is complex/infinite. You have to focus on realities
– things that concern us so that you make your research so physical. Focus on something
that you can manage.
7.
Objective
Means
removal of personal values and biases, away from unduly influences by prejudices
and values. It calls for suspension of beliefs. When conducting a research,
make your own reflection on the truth
The Role of Literature Review in
Research
Boote
& Beile (2005) define a literature review as an evaluative report of
studies found in the literature related to a selected area. They further reveal
that the literature review goes beyond the search for information and includes
the identification and articulation of relationships between the literature and
your field of research. Given the above stated definitions of research, a literature
helps reinvestigate available information, review the findings, the theories
and review of empirical research. A literature review therefore helps:
1.
Prevent
duplication of what has already been done as well as plagiarism
The
literature review helps the researcher know what has been done, how it has been
done and why such that one can be able to find discrepancies or gaps which can
filled by the research conducted. Furthermore, one can credit to themselves
findings which have already been accredited to others hence find themselves
plagiarising other people’s works which is criminal and ignorance is no excuse.
2.
It
helps in finding out what others have done and reported on the topic
This
is critical because methods which failed approaches which didn’t work and areas
not feasible can be noted and avoided beforehand. The reports help build up
better approaches to one’s research.
3.
Literature
review justifies your research
It
provides you with convincing arguments on why the research should be undertaken
this is because assumptions and hypothesis created by other research can be
reviewed as well as the strengths and weaknesses of the existing research works
done which will provide justifications for further research needed to be done.
4.
generate
new original ideas
From
the literature review one is able to create new ideas, approaches and
methodologies in the conduct of the research.
Conclusion
Research
therefore is critical, dynamic and systematic process of scientific
investigation involving study of variables in their hypothetic relationships to
provide new information, bridge gaps and ensure that a phenomenon is
understood, explained, described and predicted. It involves collection of both
primary and secondary data where primary data is collected through surveys and
secondary data through literature review which has a critical part to ensure
originality, justifying the research, avoidance of plagiarism and duplication.
Bibliography
Boote,
D.N. & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality
of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational
Researcher 34/6, 3-15.
Cozby,
P.C., (2009). Methods in behavioural research, 10th Ed. Boston:
McGraw-Hill.
The
American Heritage, Dictionary of the English Language (2009), Published
by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Kay
M, D., (2000) Research Methods in the Social Sciences: Social Research
Methods, Data Exchange Centre. D.E.C.
No comments:
Post a Comment